Tuesday, November 19, 2013

TruthExchange: Scrooge Is Among Us


Christmas is drawing near. It’s time to watch out for Santa Claus, and also for Scrooge.

This is a summary of information from the 24/7 Wall Street blog. It is based on a survey done by Glassdoor.com.

Ten of the largest U.S. employers pay their workers an average of about $19,000 a year, or about $9 an hour.  They pay their CEOs an average of $15.3 million a year, or about $7,356 per hour.

Those are rough averages, based on 40 hours a week and 52 weeks a year. CEO compensation varies from the two highest of $28.9 million at Starbucks and $20.7 million at Walmart , to the two lowest of $1.3 million at Sears and $11.1 million at Krogers.

Walmart is the largest U.S. employer, with 1.4 million workers. The smallest in this group of 10 low-wage companies is Starbucks with 120,000 employees.

The other eight employers in this list are McDonald’s, Target, Krogers, Yum! Brands, Sears, Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden, Red Lobster), Macy’s, and TJX Cos. (Marshall’s, TJMax).

Another report currently in the news estimates that the employees at a Walmart Supermarket in Wisconsin receive $900,000 a year in taxpayer support because their low wages qualify them for Medicaid, food stamps, and other benefits. 

 Estimates made in other states a few years ago placed the taxpayer cost at $400,000 to $800,000 for each Walmart store.

So, in a sense, what we don’t pay at the cash register, we pay in taxes to supplement with food stamps the low wages of the person who operates the cash register.

Walmart management disputes the salary figures for its employees, citing $25,000 a year average. Much depends on how figures are calculated.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Conservative Health Care

A converted former right-wing Republican contributed this story:

Luci and Her Visitor

Luci was sick at heart. 

On the way home at 10 PM, from her second  job as a cleaner, the stars finally aligned and three pieces fell into place;  she saw an open drugstore, she had twenty extra dollar in her purse, and she remembered she hadn't had her period since -- well, she couldn't really remember.  It had been at least four months.  She stopped at the store, and bought a pregnancy test.

She'd missed periods before, which her girlfriend Katya had put down to overwork, bad diet, and the strain of trying to raise a child with almost no money.  Luci and baby Liza lived in a fleabag motel which served two types of patrons -- those who rented by the hour (Luci could hear their rutting through the thin walls), and those whose only alternative was the street.  A tenement-style apartment would be cheaper, but Luci found it impossible to save up a security deposit.  Liza, a terrible two, was cared for by the kindly old lady in the next unit, who cleaned the motel toilets in lieu of rent.  Luci had no idea what she'd do if the old lady died or moved away. 

Luci had been home for ten minutes, and had gone straight to the bathroom with the test.  She knew she had to go next door and collect her child, but first she had to compose herself and find some strength.  The test had been positive.

Luci knelt by her bed, her face on the threadbare blanket, and sobbed.  "Dear God, why?"  she said.  "I'm not a bad girl.  It's just that I get so lonely, and when some man looks at me cross-eyed, I get pregnant.  Billy told me I looked pretty, gave me one beer after work, made love to me in the bed of his truck, and then he never called, and now I have his baby in me.  It's not fair.  Help me, God.  Help me."

There was a sighing as of wind, and a dim red glow appeared in the corner of the room.  A voice said, "I vill hear your petition."  The voice had an Eastern European accent.

Luci didn't stop to question the reality of the apparition.  She poured out her heart -- the poverty, the dead end jobs, the pain of trying to do right by Liza, and now the unexpected pregnancy -- a pregnancy in a state where an abortion in the first trimester was hard to get, even if you had money, and a pregnancy in the fourth or later month was unobtainable.

"So vy did you fall pregnant?"

Luci confessed her lapse in judgment, precipitated by loneliness and some unaccustomed alcohol.

"This is vat you need to do.  Fly to San Francisco.  Check into the Four Season hotel.  Speak with the concierge.  She can set everyting up."

Luci was dumbfounded.  "What would that cost?"

"If you are careful, not more than ten  tousand."

"Ten thousand?"  Luci screamed.  "I don't have ten!"

"Den svallow your shame, and see your GP. He can refer you to an OB-GYN who takes your employer's medical plan."

"I don't have a GP.  And my employer doesn't give me medical.  I have two part-time jobs, and neither have benefits."

"Vy do you have such miserable jobs?"

"Because I can't find anything better.  Say, what sort of angel are you, anyway?"

"And vy can't you find anything better?"

"Probably because I'm a high school dropout.  As you ought to know, angel or lady or whatever you are, I can barely read.  I can't even add without a calculator."

"And vy is dat?  Are you lazy, or stupid, or boat?"

"Well, I wasn't lazy.  I tried hard.  But my teachers were all shit;  fifty kids to a class, and we all got A's and B's.  One teacher actually said, 'I'm not going to let a bunch of stupid kids destroy my career.  You will all pass.  Let somebody else tell the principal that you're unteachable."

"Ant vere you unteachable?  Vat is dat, if not stupid?"

"I don't know.  All I know is, my Mom couldn't help me.  She was a dropout, too.  I had no place to study at home.  My teachers went home at four.  The school library closed at four."

"So vy didn't your mother put you into a better school?"

"We were POOR!  Don't you get it?  POOR!"

"Many poor people overcome many obstacles and achieve great success.  Vy veren't you vun of dem? I vas."

"Many poor people?  How many is many?  Out of how many millions of poor people? Are most of them ...fools?"

"Ach, dere it is.  As Herbert Spencer said, 'The only consequence of saving fools from their folly is to fill the world with fools.'  The world is full of fools because misguided people helped fools like you.  Vell, I'm not going to make the same mistake."

"Go to hell!"  Luci screamed.  "Who, or what, are you, anyway?"

"Vat you should say is, 'Go BACK to hell.' I am da ghost of da great philosopher Ayn Rand.  In recognition of my great visdom, Lord Satan has appointed me ambassador to the human race in general, und to da  Republican Party in particular."

"Great wisdom, my ass.  Just go to hell.  Or back to hell.  Whatever."

"Of course, Lord Satan did not SAY it vas because of my great visdom.  He is such a tease.  Vat is said vas, 'I'm kicking you out of hell because I can't stand  the sight of you.  You'll never be a demon, you're already too big a bitch.'  Funny, is it not?"

"Yeah. Hilarious."  At the red glow faded, Luci's eyes fell on the room's single closet, a dusty alcove with no door.  Between her threadbare clothes, there hung  a wire coat hanger.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Truth Exchange: ACA Is Great

  
If you read or listen to Republican obstructionists, you get the idea that the Affordable Care Act is a disaster. Listen to ordinary people and the story is different. Note this unsolicited response in an Oklahoma newspaper about one man's early enrollment:

By R.D. Miller on Nov 13
The ACA is great. I enrolled and went from 700 bucks per month to 328 starting in Jan. My old deductible was 10K and the new is about 6200.. There seems to be a lot of ranting about a good thing.


My 700 bucks a month was via my wife's policy as a state of Oklahoma teacher. My new policy for me will be BC/BShield and cuts my insurance in half or more. My doctor and hospital choices will not change. 

Monday, November 11, 2013

Job Creators?

How often are voters taken in by the pious slogans of conservatives about "job creators" and "makers" and "takers?" Bob Bianchini of Tulsa offers this insightful observation:

Frank Wang, who is paid $75,000 a year as president of Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics, rejected an opportunity for a large raise because he feared the adverse impact it likely would have on one or more of his employees.

A consultant had recommended a salary range of from $87,212 to $130,818 for his position. "I told our finance guy that I would decline any increase because 70 percent of our expenditures are for personnel, and I likely would have to let someone go or reduce someone's work hours to get the pay increase," Wang said.

Compare that to the president of a Rhode Island-based toy company, whose pay was bumped up from $25 million to $28 million, at the same time the company let 170 employees go. Can you imagine how many jobs the so-called "job creators" actually would create if they had the same attitude as Wang? Don't hold your breath.

--

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Is Medicaid Anti-Christian?

If you ever wonder what evangelical pastors think about government helping the poor, this link from CNN will enlighten you. http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/08/the-obamacare-question-pastors-shun/ . I personally have had Baptist ministers give me the same interpretation of Christian theology that you will find in this article. I don't mean to exclude other denominations; I just have not asked them.

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Truth Exchange: Blame Dems for Saving World


A Republican sought to get even with a Democrat who had posted a list of the Republicans'negative accomplishments. He sought to do it with sarcasm, which immediately backfired on him. Here is his sarcasm, followed by our response:


By Charles Reed 

A Democrat posted a list, of the Republicans' accomplishments in the last 100 years. So, I think it only fair to name a few of the Democrats' "accomplishments."

1. World War I: 53,000 killed; total casualties, 204,000
2. World War II: 400,000 killed; total casualties, 1,078,000
3. Korean War: 50,000-plus killed; total casualties, 103,000
4. Vietnam War: 53,000 killed; total casualties, 153,000

The sad thing is that most of these men were from 17 years to 23 years old. Thousands lost legs, arms, eyes.

I guess maybe for some people this pales in comparison to things like Watergate, the Great Recession and shutdown of the federal government for a few days.

 Truth Exchange
Mr. Reed,

Can you remember a little incident known as Pearl Harbor? If President Roosevelt and Congress had not responded with war, you would be speaking either Japanese or German today and ruled by either an emperor or a dictator. You seem to approve of that idea.

Do you also like the idea of a nuclear armed North Korean dictatorship controlling the great industrial capacity of South Korea, if Truman had not intervened?

Or even Europe and England ruled by Germany, in whatever form it might have taken, if we had not entered WWI (which historians now label as "the useless war" but which, nevertheless, would have ended with a German victory if Pres. Wilson had not first shipped supplies to England and then joined in the fighting.)

Vietnam was a terrible mistake, taken by a Democratic president. 1968 I made the mistake of voting for Nixon, who promised to end the war but instead expanded it into Cambodia and also brought us Watergate.  I regret that personal mistake.

Without Democrat President Roosevelt's job-creating and bank-regulating emergency actions, my family would have starved during Hoover's Great Depression. So, I would not be here to chide you for your ill-considered statements. Presuming you survived all those other calamities, I suppose you could thank Pres. Hoover and the conservatives in Congress for that.


Saturday, November 2, 2013

Give and Take: TruthExchange

Health Care? Who Needs Health Care?

This posting responds with facts to false claims made against the health care act in Oklahoma.

Michael Brakey, Skiatook,OK     

The rollout of Healthcare.gov has been a complete disaster. Stories of the site malfunctioning are being reported everywhere. Regular Americans are having extreme difficulty signing up. Liberals like Sen. Joe Manchin and entertainer Jon Stewart ("The Daily Show") think a delay of the individual mandate would be a good idea.

Some Obama-supporters are beginning to face increased costs for health care. Health-care companies are laying off Medicare doctors in droves. For instance, United HealthCare just fired thousands of Medicare Advantage doctors. That means less supply of care.

The Obama administration exempted Congress from "Obamacare." President Obama delayed the mandate for big business. Why shouldn't the mandate be delayed for all of the American people?

TruthExchange

     Mr. Brakey, do you have any interest in truth? Or do you just want to scare people the way you are scared?

     United Health Care has not "fired" Medicare Advantage doctors. It has merely removed some doctors from its network. This does not affect the availability of those doctors to treat other patients.

     At last account, the CEO of United Health Care made $5 million a year, even after the company had to pay $900 million in a lawsuit for backdating claims. And that was before the Affordable Care Act kicked in. It doesn't sound like the company, or the doctors, are suffering too much.

     The Obama Administration did not "exempt" Congress from Obamacare, whatever you meant by that. Read my response (below) to Rob Morrison.

     And, finally, Sen. Joe Manchin is far from being a liberal. He is one of the most conservative Democrats in Congress.

     Halloween is over. It’s safe for you to come out from under the covers and stop being afraid of hobgoblins.

 

Rob Morrison, Tulsa

     Mr Brakey, Oblameo is all about political payback; that’s why he gave Congress and big business special favors regarding Oblameocare. Don’t think for a second that he "cares" about the little people. He and his central planners will not be deterred from their mission, which is to shut down the insurance industry. The Oblameocare website was such a big success that only 6 people signed up the first day.

     No wonder the serpentine Kathleen Sebelius wouldn’t answer the congressional question when she was asked whether or not she would enroll in Oblameocare if she had that option. Her answer was “it’s against the law for me to enroll in the health plan…” That encapsulates the ignorance and elitist arrogance of the Obama administration. They had no intention of ever signing on to this mess.

     Why is it that some Republicans  are stepping forward and announcing that their staffs were forgoing their subsidies and joining Oblameoare? Why is it that not a single Democrat has stepped forward offering to do the same thing? It’s called hypocrisy.

 

TruthExchange

     Mr. Morrison, Congress has the burden of special, and costly, restrictions, not favors. Sen. Grassley amended the law so that Congress members and staffs have to give up the employer-based coverage that every other large employer provides and instead buy the insurance individually on the exchange. Grassley, a Republican, hoped this would make members vote against the law. It did not.

        Nearly half of the members of Congress are millionaires. They can afford the change. Their staffs, however, are ordinary working people with families to support. This will be a burden to them.

     Previously, about two-thirds of the premiums for their insurance was paid by their employer. About 95 percent of all Americans who have health insurance today get premium support from employers, or belong to Medicare. Only people who have or need individual policies—and, now, Congressional members and staff—are eligible to use the ACA exchanges.

     And, wrong again, Mr. Morrison. Secretary Sebelius was exactly right. As a Medicare recipient, the law prevents her from getting additional insurance through the exchanges. Try FactCheck.org for a full explanation.


     The Affordable Care Act was passed to make insurance available to those who have none, not for those who have insurance available for them through their employers or Medicare.

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Warren Buffett Veers Right



Newspaper Ignores Facts, Panders Right-Wing
By Bradley C. Byers
     Two years ago, billionaire Warren Buffett became a minor hero to Democrats and liberals when he wrote an op ed in the New York Times and told Charlie Rose on CNBC that the richest people should pay at least as much tax, as a percentage of income, as his secretary pays.
     Using himself as an example, he said that he pays about 14 percent while some of his small office staff pay as much as 31 percent.
     Since that time, Mr. Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway group has been buying newspapers in small to medium sized cities. As of March 2013 he had bought 28 papers, and in July he purchased more. He has said he hopes to save those newspapers, as well as turn a small profit.
     In doing so, he brought hope to some communities. Tulsa, Oklahoma is a good example. Although clearly declining in size and staff, the 95,000 daily circulation Tulsa World had held to its reputation of solid reporting and even-handed editorials that tried to lead readers to a better understanding of national issues than they were getting from right-wing talk shows and the internet. This, in a state with a solid tradition of right-wing politics.
     Every state-wide and national office in Oklahoma is held by Republicans. And in the 2012 primary, Tulsans elected a tea party Republican over a strongly conservative Republican incumbent.
     So, many in Tulsa looked to Buffett’s purchase with hope that it would not mean the imposition of strongly conservative interpretations into the newspaper’s staff-written editorials.
     But that was not to be. Mr. Buffett’s newly appointed publisher immediately announced that the newspaper would “reflect the views of the community.” The result became apparent on October 29 when the lead editorial concluded: “…if the Obama Administration can’t put together a working website with years of advance notice, what would lead us to conclude they can actually do anything about health care costs?”

     The next day, the editorialist followed with “The flawed roll-out of the "Obamacare" exchange system put the administration's competence in question.”
     In a letter to the editor, a long-time reader challenged the basis of such conclusions. “That’s like saying ‘if an army cannot advance through a mine field without losing some soldiers, how can they win a battle?’ Republicans planted mines and fired artillery at every possible moment to try to stop Obamacare from working. 
     “Obama planned for the states to set up the websites, using Federal dollars. But 36 Republican states refused, while challenging the law in court and trying 43 times to repeal it. So, after waiting for the Supreme Court to rule, the Administration had the hugely complex job of setting up websites covering those 36 states, with different insurance companies and policies in every state.
     “As a final effort,” the letter continued, “Republicans shut down the government in a futile attempt to remove funding for Obamacare. And now the Tulsa World tells us the resulting start-up problems are ‘proof …that the federal government has no place in this business (of health care) in the first place.’
     “To the editorial writers we used to respect, RIP. To the owner, Mr. Buffett,  and the present staff of editorialists, ‘for shame.’”
                                                           ###                

Bradley C. Byers, of Tulsa, is a retired journalist. He writes the blog ByersAware, where this article will soon appear.

http://byersaware.blogspot.com/2013/10/freedom-to-be-ignorant.html

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Freedom To Be Ignorant


My Money or My Life


In one of Jack Benny’s enduring jokes, he was accosted by a highwayman who demanded, “Stand and deliver. Your money or your life.”

After a pause, the highwayman repeated: “I said, your money or your life!” To which Benny responded: “I’m THINKING.”

Lots of ordinary Republicans hate government in any form, as much as Benny pretended to hate spending money. Republicans like spending money. Just not on taxes.
                                                     
So they complain: “The government thinks it knows how to spend my money better than I do.”

That “my money” comment always puzzles me.

    I'm puzzled about how to spend "my" money without paying taxes. Doesn’t the government print and mint that money? No taxes, no government. No government, no money.

     The Republicans that I know like to play the slot machines at the casino, and they like to buy guns. Could they raise enough chickens and potatoes in their back yards to do that? First, though, they’d have to trade some chickens to get someone to teach them how to read the directions at the casino and the gun show..  

    Oops again. They’d need some potatoes to pay for riding the private toll road to get to the casino. Takes lots of potato digging.


    Darned government, anyway. It just interferes with our freedom to be as ignorant as we choose to be.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Obamacare: A Mushroom Cloud



According to the new editorial chief of the Tulsa World newspaper, prosperous businesses refuse to hire new people because they are uncertain about details in the Affordable Care Act and worry about future changes. That, plus the potential that the national debt will “wreck the U.S. economy.”

And, the editor writes, if you already have a job and insurance, the Affordable Care Act is “costing you the prosperity of an economy growing fast enough to make sure your children and grandchildren have jobs and insurance too.” This, he says, is the most effective argument available to opponents of the act.

As evidence, he cites the decision of a mushroom farmer who has 300 employees and 250 contract workers. This farmer said his business needs another 100 people. But he won’t expand because of  “ever-present concern” about possible rules changes in the Affordable Care Act, and the potential for the national debt to wreck the economy.
          
        This mushroom farmer is used by Oklahoma’s Sen. Tom Coburn to attack the ACA and the national debt. There was no acknowledgement by the senator or the editorialist that the number one uncertainty in the nation is an economy devastated by a recession -- a recession triggered by Republican policies of tax cuts and deregulation long before the ACA was anything more than a dream.

          And so it goes in the World of conservative Republicans who just last week cost the nation’s economy an estimated $24 billion by shutting down government for 16 days. And they seem ready to do so again next January.
                                                    
None So Blind

          The Christian bible contains a verse to this effect: “There is none so blind as he who will not see.” Last week a writer for Salon magazine showed just how true that verse can be.

          Three couples appeared on Fox News to complain about how much they are suffering because of Obamacare.  The Salon writer, who has worked on insurance issues for a western state governor, was suspicious. So, he spoke with each complainant by phone, and then did some research on the web.

          The first couple said they cannot expand their business because of Obamacare. But they did not disclose on Fox that they have only four employees. Obamacare does not affect businesses with fewer than 50 employees.

          The second couple pay $13,000 a year for insurance that excludes one of their children because of a pre-existing condition. They complained because their carrier has advised them it will have to make changes in their policy under Obamacare. They have not explored any options. They hate Obamacare.

          But the reporter did explore the options. He found the couple could get a policy on the exchange that would cost 60 percent less and would also cover their child.

          The third couple are self-employed. They pay $10,000 for health insurance. They said their insurance company told them their premiums will go up by 50 to 75 percent because of Obamacare.

          Again, the reporter checked the exchange. He found a policy with equal coverage that would cost the couple 63 percent less, not more.

          Indeed, there are none so blind as those who will not see – beyond the ranting of Ted Cruz and Fox News.


          You can read the Salon story on AlterNet at http://www.alternet.org/print/media/fox-news-coverage-obamacare-was-extremely-misleading.

Friday, October 18, 2013

Give and Take--Will ACA Collapse?


   A newspaper in a tea party state printed this letter Oct. 18:

   Yes, the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land. But "we the people" didn't get to vote on its passage. It was forced on us by a Democratic House, Democratic Senate, and Democratic president.
   It doesn't benefit the majority of U.S. citizens. In fact, only about 30 million are covered. But the financial impact hits everyone. We don't need to repeal it because it will collapse under its own weight.

   They enacted it to benefit you, and me, and most other Americans.

   If you could set aside your my-mind-is-made-up prejudices long enough to read objective information about the law, you would see that it does benefit most of us.  It allows people with high blood pressure or diabetes to get insurance. It returned billions of dollars to people who were being overcharged on their existing policies last year. It kept my 23 year-old-college-graduate granddaughter, now existing as a waitress while searching for another job, on her parents insurance for another three years.

   Despite roadblocks thrown up by 21 states, the ACA set up web sites where people not covered by employer-based group insurance can search for the best available plan. Yes, those web sites have some glitches. How many computer programs can you name that encountered no problems at start-up?

   In another year, the ACA will lower the cost of insurance for you and me when our premiums no longer have to pay for emergency room care for millions of people who had no insurance before the ACA.  

   Yes, some people who are already insured are going to pay higher premiums, at least for a while. In return for those higher premiums, they can no longer be dropped, yearly and lifetime limits on coverage have been removed, pre-existing illnesses will be covered if they have to change insurance carriers through loss of their jobs or other reasons, and their children can remain on their policies until age 26.

   And, despite all the claims and all the obstacles thrown up by conservative Republicans, the ACA will not collapse. On the contrary, those Republicans are worried precisely because they know it will succeed and become as popular and beneficial as Medicare and Social Security. 

   Relax. You may object to the taste of this medicine as it goes down, but you'll feel better in the morning.

Thursday, October 17, 2013

A Defensive Victory

Wednesday night brought only a defensive victory for the forces of Camelot II. A mere 40 Barbarians led a 16 day siege of the castle, brought up their battering ram (debt ceiling), then withdrew with a concession on the sequester. And they vowed to renew the siege in 3 months.

In my deep red state, new Republican registrations this year far outnumber Democrats. Camelot forces nationwide must register new recruits door to door in below-median neighborhoods. Each household must be given a compelling list of the miseries the Barbarians already have wrought on the poor, the middle class, and the nation, and what they hope yet to do. By and large, voters have little idea of what the conservatives have done to them.  Without a successful inform-and-register blitz,, their will be no spring, summer, or November victories.

Love for Slavery?

Through Deep Red Glasses

   Online newspaper comment by "Jean" in a deep red state:
  • "The Tea Party isn't going away, any more than the slave engineers aka Democrats. The former are members of the party that freed the slaves, while the latter are the party who brought the slaves to this country and then treated them worse than cattle. But some people in this country today continue to enjoy that enslavement and show their love of that wrong by continuing to vote their slavers back into power.

    "I will say it again: If Obama Care is so great, terrific for you and me, then why isn't it the same for Obama and the Democrats? Get the cobwebs out of your head and think about that one for a while."

    The statements by Jean were posted immediately after the vote in Washington, D.C. to reopen government. They carry important warnings for everyone who has hope of restoring sanity in Congress and in state governments: The extremists will never be influenced by facts. Or, as was stated long ago, "You cannot reason prejudice out of a person; it wasn't reason that put it there."

    Defying all reason, Jean thinks that people who receive any form of government assistance do so because they are lazy and irresponsible, and to her this is just another way of defining slavery. Remember Mitt Romney's statement that he could not make "the 47 percent take responsibility for themselves?"

    And I wonder, has anyone ever explained to the Jeans of our nation that the Affordable Care Act, in the form of state exchanges, simply provides access to insurance for those who do not already have coverage? She thinks that government employees, whose health insurance with private companies is jointly funded by the employer and the employees, should be forced to drop that coverage and use the exchanges to seek individual policies. But she does not want to apply that rule to her own employer-assisted policy.

    In short, she does not think. She merely reacts to what she hears.

    You and I have two responsibilities toward the "Jeans" among us. The first responsibility is to make it publicly known that we disagree with them. If we let politeness prevent us from speaking out, Jean's neighbors will assume that she is right because they hear nothing else. The "herd instinct" will influence their opinions and their votes. That's why the red states--which are largely the Deep South--are so deeply red.

    Our second responsibility is to tell the inactive and the uninformed among us, especially the "47 percent," the truth about the harm they are suffering at the hands of the extreme conservatives. We must get them to register and vote. If we fail to do this, the extremists will win next year's elections.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Courage Needed

Missing: Courage to Admit a Mistake

   According to Encyclopedia Britannica, in 2008 Obama won more than 69 million votes. In 2012, more than 65 million. No other candidate has ever surpassed 65 million votes.

   The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, was a key issue in the 2012 election. Romney promised to repeal it. But Obama got 3 million more popular votes than Romney. Another main issue on which Obama won was his handling of the recession.

   
Contrast that to support for the Koch and tea party. Eleven of their members were defeated. As of January 6, 2013, the their caucus had only 53 members. The House of Representatives consists of 435 members, the Senate another 100. Yet this small minority of House members have shut down much of the government and appear ready and perhaps able to force the United States to refuse to pay its legitimate debts. That’s what failure to raise the debt limit would do. It very likely would throw the entire world into economic chaos. It would soon shut down payments of Social Security benefits, veterans pensions, Medicare and Medicaid, and disrupt business and employment throughout the nation.

   Somehow this small group, most of whom have little knowledge of how the government operates, have been able to scare a lot of Americans into thinking they are in danger of losing their freedoms—unnamed “freedoms” that often prove to be valuable or even essential services that the government performs for its citizens.


   Why? Why do the American people put up with it? Why don’t the people who voted for these members of Congress call their offices—either local or in Washington—and tell them that they have had enough? Does it take too much courage to admit, “I made a mistake, but I will not make it again?”

 
 Will we continue to let a small but loud minority set the agenda for the whole country?"

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Give and Take Once More

Who’s Afraid of Healthcare?
    Annie posted on  “Politicususa” : What I don’t get is how anyone can defend the healthcare Act. So many Americans are seeing their hours cut, our healthcare costs are rising because of it. Friends who did not have insurance were encouraged because the Act was passed, only to learn that they could better afford healthcare before all this was put into motion.

  COMMENT: Annie, if you are getting this kind of false information from friends, you need to find better friends. If from members of Congress, you need to listen to members who know what they are talking about (among those to avoid,  Michelle Bachmann and her belief that Obama is supporting al-Qaeda and bringing the biblical end times; she read it in the bible).

   There is no credible information that what you claim to be true is happening on more than a piecemeal scale. Your favorite Congressmen tell you the people don’t want Obamacare, and yet 8 million started the signup process in the first week, although the deadline is not until mid-March.

   FactCheck.org says, The fact is, some will pay more and some will pay less. Some currently uninsured Americans will pay little or nothing because of the law’s expansion of Medicaid.
   
   That Other Guy’s Too Fat                  
   Concerning the shutdown, a reader wrote:  I think this country needs to trim the fat. If your government job is not essential to the running of this country, then it should not exist.

   COMMENT: National parks are not essential. But that's the first thing House  Republicans threw a fit about when they learned that the parks are a part of the government they voted to shut down.

   Is NASA essential? Do you want to shut it down permanently? How about the FDIC that guarantees to pay for your savings if your bank fails? It is not essential to the hourly wage worker who has no bank account or savings. How about food and drug inspections? Not essential if you grow all your own food and never need medicine. How about public schools? Not essential if you have no children, or can afford private schools.

   ONE PERSON’S “ESSENTIAL” is another person's luxury. Are you sure you have thought this subject through? It is obvious that a lot of the people we elected to Congress have not thought it through. Among a few thousand other shortcomings, they have thrown another huge setback to the backlogged processing of claims for veterans' benefits by shutting down much of the non-essential Veterans Administration. Obviously  House Republicans do not consider it essential to compensate or care for soldiers that they sent into combat.

   Oh, I forgot. All the House Republicans did was cut off the money for the VA. It must be Obama's fault for telling the employees they don't have to come to work without pay.


Friday, October 11, 2013

Give and Take

   Lock 'em Up, Throw 'em Out

  In a local newspaper, two letters repeated the fanciful (and in my view, irresponsible) notion that the way to get a functioning Congress is just to vote everyone out office. One of them also said the immediate solution is to lock the Congress and the President in a room together and not let them out until they reach agreement.

  These recommendations came in a red state and from congressional districts that sent two new tea party members to Congress last year, and a state that ranks among the worst in education, teenage births, single parent families, health insurance, poverty levels, voter turnout, and most every other indicator of government incompetence.

   COMMENT: "...vote them out of office and elect a Congress that will do its job."

   Tell me, how are you going to get the voters to educate themselves on what the new Congressional candidates stand for? We get the Congress we elect, the Congress we deserve, because we don't care enough to become informed.

   Take your two NEW local Congressmen, both tea party members. Both strongly support government shutdown, default on our nation's debts, and doing away with a new health care system that 8 million people tried to sign up for in the first week it was offered (contributing to a computer overload).

   It was clear to anyone who bothered to pay attention that they held the same anti-government beliefs as Newt Gingrich, who was responsible for the previous shutdown. So, they naturally fell in behind Ted Cruz, who has visions of himself as the second coming of Gingrich and his "contract with America."

   As for your lock-'em-up solution, that sounds a lot like the military takeover in Egypt where they locked up the president (Morsi) and threw out the parliament. (I am glad they got rid of Morsi but regret the way they had to do it.)

   My main point: Citizens have to take responsibility, inform ourselves, and then vote intelligently instead of voting for ideology and emotion. The problem does not start with Congress. It starts with us.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Give and Take

  In the Beginning….

  Responding to our statement that voters should become informed, not just promise to vote everybody out of office, a reader wrote: "This stuff (shutdown and refusal to raise the debt ceiling) started LONG before (the 2012) election.”

  COMMENT: Of course it did. But that election gave us Ted Cruz to replace the laughable “second-coming-end-of-the-world” Michelle Bachmann as leader of the Koch-and-Tea Party. And it gave Shutdown-Ted more followers.  Unless voters study the candidates and issues, the next election could give us a Republican-controlled Senate, with Shutdown-Ted Cruz as Majority Leader. In that case, say goodbye to Social Security and Medicare.

  Big, Bad Government

  The reader further claimed: "(It) began when President Obama and the Democratic leadership of the 110th and 111th Congresses enacted the largest peacetime expansion of the Federal government in U. S. history, and chose to do so during the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression.”


 COMMENT: Without the expansion of unemployment compensation and food stamps, without the successful bailout of General Motors, without the TARP funds, we’d have failed banks, bread lines, soup kitchens, and unemployment approaching Great Depression levels. When the economy truly tanks, government has to spend to get it back on track.

  To Budge or not to Budge(it)

  And he wrote further: “Obama’s  2009 budget, $1.4 trillion deficit and all, was pushed through Congress as an emergency measure that was absolutely necessary for the survival of the nation and its economy. But then he dropped the ball and allowed all of fiscal 2010 to go by without a Federal budget."

  COMMENT: The President presented his budget request. But by law budget bills must originate in the House and then be passed (or modified) by the Senate, then either sent to a conference committee for negotiation or to the President for approval.

   It takes two to tango, and two parties to pass a budget. The Democratic Senate sent its modified budget bill to the House last April. The House refused to appoint a conference committee to negotiate, all the while shouting loudly and falsely that the Democrats would not negotiate.

  And they are still shouting, while shutting down much of the government, denying salaries, veterans benefits, military death payments, food stamps, and many other survival needs to both public employees and ordinary citizens whom they scorn as freeloaders or worse—and whom they DO NOT want to have health insurance.
  
  The present impasse and partial government shutdown is caused by House Republicans. They will not agree to let spending continue at last year’s level (the usual practice) while working on a full-year budget—all because they hope to force Obama to do away with the Affordable Care Act against the will of the majority who elected him for a second term.



Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Throw 'em Out



A newspaper reader wrote the following:

We're seeing our 401(k)s and IRAs decrease every day as Congress plays its games, but lawmakers' pensions or salaries will not decrease. Congress is more interested in the party than what is best for the country.
Re-elect no one.

His letter is typical of people who take no personal responsibility for voting, yet feel justified in criticizing the results. In the area where this man lives, two new members were elected to Congress by wide margins last year—and they are loudly outspoken in support of  the very actions the letter-writer is deploring.

COMMENT: You are right to be concerned. But your solution is part of the problem. Voters in your area  "threw em out“ last year-- and got two worse ones in their place. Bridenstine and Mullen are solidly in support of crashing the government in order to gain power for their extreme right wing Koch and Tea Party radicals.


The only way to get good government, Mr. Smith, is to pay attention to what is going on and who is causing the problems. Then vote for people who by their stated positions and by the positions of their political party demonstrate that they are for GOOD government, not SMALL government or BIG government. Each of us should assess our own voting record and determine whether we have been a part of the solution or part of the problem.

Monday, October 7, 2013

Koch and Tea, Anyone?

o Echo Chamber Shutdown

      Republicans in Congress live in an echo chamber. They hear only their own voices coming back at them and think they are messages from On High. Columnist Pat Buchanan typified that Octobaer 5 by arguing that the government shutdown "is all about a petulant president whose prize program the people do not want but who insists it be imposed upon them." The echo chamber convinces Buchanan that such an absurd statement is truth, ignoring the 7 million people who rushed to sign up for the Affordable Care Act in the first 4 days although, he says, they do not want the "prize program."


o    The Koch Protection Racket
o    The Koch-and-Tea Party (KTP) in the House of  Representatives have declared that they will rule the nation like a Mafia protection racket. First, they shut down all the government agencies except those that have funding beyond their immediate control. Then, if you want to reopen one part of it, such as the WWII memorial on the Washington Mall, guarantee them lots of television publicity and they will let it reopen. If you need food for your baby through the closed WIC program, just get down on your knees and pledge everlasting loyalty to the KTP.
BUT, they will watch the entire government go up in flames rather than provide funding for programs they do not like. Never mind that doing so violates their own oath of office.  

More Give and Take
Several posts on Facebook have said that Congress and the President should not get paid while non-essential government workers are furloughed because the Republican House refuses to pass a funding bill. Not a bad idea (especially if it applied only to those House Republicans who are denying the funding).
HOWEVER, I’m sure the President and the 257 members of Congress who are millionaires (nearly half of Congress) can muddle through somehow without their salaries. Did you know that the new crop we elected to Congress just last year (Ted Cruz and company) also have a median net worth of $1 million? I don't think they'd miss the salary very much. But the 7 million people who ALREADY have tried to sign up for health insurance in the first 4 days of Affordable Care Act exchanges would suffer if that insurance had not been made available to them. (It IS AVAILABLE; the shutdown did not affect it, even though it was the reason for the Republican rebellion.)

Model T and Health Care

                
In Oklahoma, the Governor and Republican legislators lost federal funds for a state plan to insure some low income people because of steps they took to deny Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (which would have covered more poverty families at NO cost to the state for 3 years, and then just 10 percent state cost afterward). A citizen in Tulsa responded the following way:

My granddad's generation considered the Model T a great car. They loved its 20 horsepower engine, nifty 45 mph top speed and the great color selection (black).
Some of our state’s politicians must love the Model T. They praise “Insure Oklahoma.” They are not bothered by its limitations and evidently they haven't noticed that something better has come along.

The Affordable Care Act combined with expanded Medicaid would cover more people than Insure Oklahoma does. The ACA would accept people with pre-existing conditions. It allows children to remain on their parents insurance up to age 26 instead of 19 (the age limit under Insure Oklahoma). It eliminates lifetime limits on essential medical expenses. It prohibits insurers from dropping your coverage or raising your premiums if you get sick.
It provides free screenings and closes the prescription “donut hole”. It sets coverage standards that insurers have to meet. The ACA offers a greater selection of insurance products. The state exchanges of the ACA allow you to compare fifty nine plans from five different private insurers to pick the best fit for your family. But Oklahoma is fighting it at the Supreme Court.
While poorly informed politicians may extol the virtues of Insure Oklahoma, it isn't adequate for the needs of Oklahoma's uninsured. Like the Model T, Insure Oklahoma is just an outdated clunker that doesn't provide the benefits of the Affordable Care Act.

Youth Versus Wisdom

Koch-and-Tea Party freshman Rep. James Bridenstine used a news interview to proclaim his support for shutting down the government rather than allowing the Affordable Care Law to continue.
Mr. Bridenstine, you are young and eager. These are good qualities. But eagerness is no substitute for wisdom. A partial government shutdown is an extremely damaging action, not a wise action. It does not hurt me directly, at least not yet, but it is hurting many other people now and will cause long term damage to many, many more.
Your stated reason for the shutdown is your desire to be rid of Obamacare. Yet, already your House colleagues have conceded that the shutdown will not be able to do that. Now they seem to be playing games to see whether they can wring some kind of concessions from the majority in the Senate and from the President. Those goals appear to be mostly face-saving rather than any realistic attempt to provide good governance to the citizens whose interests you were elected to uphold.
I sincerely hope you have enough character to face reality in this situation, to help pass a straightforward continuing resolution to fund government operations for the near future, and to appoint a conference committee to negotiate with the Senate, as the Senate has requested, on a long-term budget.

Kochs Fund Health Care Fight 
NYTimes Oct. 5, 2013

”The billionaire Koch brothers, Charles and David, have been deeply involved with financing the overall effort (to kill Obamacare by shutting down the federal government). A group linked to the Kochs, Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, disbursed more than $200 million last year to nonprofit organizations involved in the fight. Included was $5 million to Generation Opportunity, which created a buzz last month with an Internet advertisement showing a menacing Uncle Sam figure popping up between a woman’s legs during a gynecological exam.

Surely no comment is needed. Pay attention to how often the House Republicans claim “the people don’t want Obamacare.” These are the “people” they are talking about. Is there any doubt the Koch-and-Tea Party controls the U.S. House?




Sunday, October 6, 2013

Tea Party Echoes


o    Tea Party Echoes
o    Republicans live in an echo chamber. They hear their own voices coming back at them and think they are messages from On High. Columnist Pat Buchanan typified that Oct. 5 by arguing the government shutdown "is all about a petulant president whose prize program the people do not want but who insists it be imposed upon them." The echo chamber convinces Buchanan that such an absurd statement is truth, ignoring the 7 million people who rushed to sign up for the Affordable Care Act in the first four days. Are these the people he says do not want the program? Or are they just the millions who crave health insurance and don’t know that the “Obamacare” they have been told to fear is actually the Affordable Care Act?
o     
o     
o    The Koch Protection Racket
o    The Koch-and-Tea Party (KTP) in the House of  Representatives have declared that they will rule the nation like a Mafia protection racket. First, they shut down all the government agencies except those that have funding beyond their immediate control. Then, if you want to reopen one part of it, such as the WWII memorial on the Washington Mall, guarantee them lots of television publicity and they will let it reopen. If you need food for your baby through the closed WIC program, just get down on your knees and pledge everlasting loyalty to the KTP.
BUT, they will watch the entire government go up in flames rather than provide funding for programs they do not like. Never mind that doing so violates their own oath of office.  

More Give and Take
Several posts on Facebook have said that Congress and the President should not get paid while non-essential government workers are furloughed because the Republican House refuses to pass a funding bill. Not a bad idea (especially if it applied only to those House Republicans who are denying the funding).
HOWEVER, I’m sure the President and the 257 members of Congress who are millionaires (nearly half of Congress) can muddle through somehow without their salaries. Did you know that the new crop we elected to Congress just last year (Ted Cruz and company) also have a median net worth of $1 million? I don't think they'd miss the salary very much. But the 7 million people who ALREADY have tried to sign up for health insurance in the first 4 days of Affordable Care Act exchanges would suffer if that insurance had not been made available to them. (It IS AVAILABLE; the shutdown did not affect it, even though it was the reason for the Republican rebellion.)

Model T and Health Care


                
In Oklahoma, the Governor and Republican legislators lost federal funds for a state plan to insure some low income people because of steps they took to deny Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (which would have covered more poverty families at NO cost to the state for 3 years, and then just 10 percent state cost afterward). A citizen in Tulsa responded the following way:

My granddad's generation considered the Model T a great car. They loved its 20 horsepower engine, nifty 45 mph top speed and the great color selection (black).
Some of our state’s politicians must love the Model T. They praise “Insure Oklahoma.” They are not bothered by its limitations and evidently they haven't noticed that something better has come along.
The Affordable Care Act combined with expanded Medicaid would cover more people than Insure Oklahoma does. The ACA would accept people with pre-existing conditions. It allows children to remain on their parents insurance up to age 26 instead of 19 (the age limit under Insure Oklahoma). It eliminates lifetime limits on essential medical expenses. It prohibits insurers from dropping your coverage or raising your premiums if you get sick.
It provides free screenings and closes the prescription “donut hole”. It sets coverage standards that insurers have to meet. The ACA offers a greater selection of insurance products. The state exchanges of the ACA allow you to compare fifty nine plans from five different private insurers to pick the best fit for your family. But Oklahoma is fighting it at the Supreme Court.
While poorly informed politicians may extol the virtues of Insure Oklahoma, it isn't adequate for the needs of Oklahoma's uninsured. Like the Model T, Insure Oklahoma is just an outdated clunker that doesn't provide the benefits of the Affordable Care Act.
Youth Versus Wisdom
Koch-and-Tea Party freshman Rep. James Bridenstine used a news interview to proclaim his support for shutting down the government rather than allowing the Affordable Care Law to continue.
Mr. Bridenstine, you are young and eager. These are good qualities. But eagerness is no substitute for wisdom. A partial government shutdown is an extremely damaging action, not a wise action. It does not hurt me directly, at least not yet, but it is hurting many other people now and will cause long term damage to many, many more.
Your stated reason for the shutdown is your desire to be rid of Obamacare. Yet, already your House colleagues have conceded that the shutdown will not be able to do that. Now they seem to be playing games to see whether they can wring some kind of concessions from the majority in the Senate and from the President. Those goals appear to be mostly face-saving rather than any realistic attempt to provide good governance to the citizens whose interests you were elected to uphold.
I sincerely hope you have enough character to face reality in this situation, to help pass a straightforward continuing resolution to fund government operations for the near future, and to appoint a conference committee to negotiate with the Senate, as the Senate has requested, on a long-term budget.

Kochs Fund Health Care Fight 
NYTimes Oct. 6, 2013

”The billionaire Koch brothers, Charles and David, have been deeply involved with financing the overall effort (to kill Obamacare by shutting down the federal government). A group linked to the Kochs, Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, disbursed more than $200 million last year to nonprofit organizations involved in the fight. Included was $5 million to Generation Opportunity, which created a buzz last month with an Internet advertisement showing a menacing Uncle Sam figure popping up between a woman’s legs during a gynecological exam.


Surely no comment is needed. Pay attention to how often the House Republicans claim “the people don’t want Obamacare.” These are the “people” they are talking about.